The United States on Tuesday vetoed an Arab-backed and widely supported U.N. resolution demanding an immediate humanitarian cease-fire in the Israel-Hamas war in the embattled Gaza Strip, saying it would interfere with negotiations on a deal to free hostages abducted in Israel. 
 
The vote in the 15-member Security Council was 13-1 with the United Kingdom abstaining, reflecting the strong support from countries around the globe for ending the more than four-month war, which started when Hamas militants invaded southern Israel, killing about 1,200 people and taking 250 others hostage. Since then, more than 29,000 Palestinians have been killed in Israel's military offensive, according to the Gaza Health Ministry which says the vast majority were women and children, reports AP. 
 
It was the third U.S. veto of a Security Council resolution demanding a cease-fire in Gaza and came a day after the United States circulated a rival resolution that would support a temporary cease-fire in Gaza linked to the release of all hostages and call for the lifting of all restrictions on the delivery of humanitarian aid. 
 
Virtually every council member - including the United States - expressed serious concern at the impending catastrophe in Gaza's southern city of Rafah, where some 1.5 million Palestinians have sought refuge, if Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu goes ahead with his plan to evacuate civilians from the city and move Israel's military offensive to the area bordering Egypt, where Israel says Hamas fighters are hiding. 
 
Before the vote, Algeria's U.N. Ambassador Amar Bendjama, the Arab representative on the council, said: "This resolution stands for truth and humanity standing against the advocates for murder and hatred." 
 
"A vote in favor of this draft resolution is a support to the Palestinians right to life," he said. "Conversely, voting against it implies an endorsement of the brutal violence and collective punishment inflicted against them." 
 
U.S. Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield said the United States understands the council's desire for urgent action but believes the resolution would "negatively impact" sensitive negotiations on a hostage deal and pause in fighting for at least six weeks. If that happens, "we can take the time to build a more enduring peace," she said. 
 
The proposed U.S. resolution, Thomas-Greenfield said, "would do what this text does not - pressure Hamas to take the hostage deal that is on the table and help secure a pause that allows humanitarian assistance to reach Palestinian civilians in desperate need." 
 
Bd-pratidin English/Lutful Hoque